BioInformatics - market insights from gene to drug Powered by ECNext
Home > Research Reports > Life Sciences > The Tools & Techniques of Drug Discovery: Bioassays

Publication Details

The Tools & Techniques of Drug Discovery: Bioassays

Generic Keywords: (What are these?)
market research, life science market, biotech market, biotechnology market, proteomics market, DNA sequencing market, biosciences market, microarrays market, molecular biology market, reagent market, qPCR market, genomics market, customer surveys, bioinformatics


Publication Date: 01-MAY-02
Pages: 130
Hardcopy Print -- $800.00
PDF document -- $1,100.00
   

Description

One of the present bottlenecks in drug discovery is in efficiently identifying drug targets for additional research. By employing bioassays in automated format, the characterization of a large number of drug targets can be streamlined. Standardized bioassays that can faithfully replicate biological reactions and generate informative data are essential for successfully performing high-throughput screening (HTS). The development of new technologies in functional genomics and proteomics has facilitated the discovery of an ever-increasing number of drug targets. These advances, together with high-throughput technologies for screening large compound libraries and sophisticated bioinformatics platforms, have resulted in an abundance of promising early-stage drug candidates.

The investigation of end-user needs in Bioassays can be leveraged across several product categories with the goals of developing better products and expanding market penetration. To this end, the survey data has been placed in context by cross-tabulating it with the responses to an initial 14-question survey designed to provide baseline data on the nature of the respondent's drug discovery research. Included in these cross-tabulations are: the stage of research, type of research, disease targets, biological processes studied, and other related products and services used regularly.

The results of the seven surveys conducted for this unique series of reports clearly show that past distinctions between the stages of drug discovery are diminishing. Bioassays is structured to reflect the market's integration, while highlighting end-user problems that represent exciting market opportunities for life science suppliers.

Report Highlights

Along with a comprehensive overview of significant findings, Bioassays contains detailed charts and graphs depicting the answers to all 34 survey questions and over 20 cross-tabulations. Below is a glimpse of the key findings derived from a few of the survey questions.

• 40% of the respondents claim that their use of in vitro protein assays will increase over the next 12 months. (Question 10)
• The majority (58%) of respondents report that "cost of assay kits and/or reagents" is an operational problem that they have encountered when using in vitro protein assays. (Question 14)
• Only 1% of respondents expect their use of cell-based assays to decrease over the next 12 months. (Question 22)
• "Variable performance with different cell types" (28%) is the most significant performance limitation experienced by a respondent's lab/group when using cell-based assays. (Question 25)
• Amersham Biosciences (12%) was the company most frequently mentioned when the respondents were asked which company/supplier comes to mind when they think of bioassays. (Question 29)

(Electronic copy also includes 1 print copy)

Table of Contents

  1. Section 1 Executive Overview and Introduction
  2. 1-1 Among the Study's Key Findings
  3. 1-2 Bioassays, High-Throughput Screening and Drug Discovery
  4. 1-2 Innovations
  5. 1-3 Key Bioassay-Based HTS Innovations
  6. 1-3 Detection Methodologies
  7. 1-5 Bioassays for HTS
  8. 1-7 Evolution of Bioassays: Formats and Functions
  9. Section 2 Study Methodology and Demographics
  10. 2-1 Objectives
  11. 2-1 Comments
  12. 2-2 Assumptions
  13. 2-3 Definition of Terms
  14. 2-4 Market Segment
  15. 2-4 Organization Size
  16. 2-4 Laboratory Size
  17. 2-4 Job Position
  18. 2-4 Geographic Region
  19. 2-5 Area(s) of Research
  20. Section 3 Significant Findings
  21. 3-1 In Vitro Protein Assays
  22. 3-2 Cell-Based Assays
  23. Section 4 Presentation of Survey Data
  24. Product Use & Application
  25. 4-1 Current use of bioassays
  26. 4-4 Locations where bioassay experiments are performed
  27. 4-6 Principle reason bioassays experiments are not performed within own lab/group
  28. 4-8 Applications for which bioassays are used
  29. 4-10 Relative amount of time spent performing in vitro or cell-based assays
  30. In Vitro Assays
  31. 4-12 Applications for which in vitro protein assays are used
  32. 4-14 Detection method most commonly employed in in vitro protein assays
  33. 4-16 Percentage of in vitro protein assays performed using specific types of proteins
  34. 4-17 Average number of individual data points collected from the in vitro protein assays performed per week
  35. 4-18 Future use of in vitro protein assays
  36. 4-20 Most influential features in decision to use one in vitro protein assay over another
  37. 4-22 Most influential factor in decision to purchase one in vitro protein assay over another
  38. 4-24 Most significant performance limitation of in vitro protein assays
  39. 4-26 Operational problems encountered in using in vitro protein assays
  40. 4-28 Most valuable improvement to in vitro protein assays
  41. 4-30 Interest in automating in vitro protein assays
  42. Cell-Based Assays
  43. 4-31 Type(s) of cell-based assays used
  44. 4-33 Application(s) for which cell-based assays are used
  45. 4-35 Detection method most commonly employed when performing cell-based assays
  46. 4-37 Average number of days to perform a cell-based assay
  47. 4-38 Average number of individual data points collected from enzyme assays per week
  48. 4-39 Future use of cell-based assays
  49. 4-41 Most influential features in decision to use one cell-based assay over another
  50. 4-43 Most influential factor in decision to purchase one cell-based assay over another
  51. 4-45 Most significant performance limitation experienced when using cell-based assays
  52. 4-47 Operational problems encountered in using cell-based assays
  53. 4-49 Most valuable improvements to cell-based assays
  54. 4-51 Interest in automating cell-based assays
  55. Technologies & Suppliers
  56. 4-52 "Top-of-mind" company/supplier for bioassays
  57. 4-53 Primary supplier of reagents and kits for bioassays
  58. 4-55 Familiarity with suppliers of reagents and kits for bioassays
  59. 4-57 Estimated percentage of current total annual budget for products/services is dedicated to bioassays
  60. 4-58 Estimated percentage of future total annual budget for products/services is dedicated to bioassays
  61. Section 5 Benchmarking Data
  62. 5-1 Stage of drug discovery research
  63. 5-2 Type of drug discovery research conducted
  64. 5-4 Disease focus of drug discovery research
  65. 5-6 Biological processes or states monitored
  66. 5-8 Techniques used
  67. 5-10 Automated systems used
  68. 5-12 Types of equipment used
  69. 5-13 "Top-of-mind" company for products and services for drug discovery
  70. Section 6 Appendices
  71. 6-1 Overall comments as to where suppliers should focus their efforts
  72. 6-2 Cross-Tabulations of Survey Data
  73. 6-25 Related Reports
  74. 6-31 About BioInformatics
  75. 6-32 Our Valued Clients

The Tools & Techniques of Drug Discovery: Bioassays - Market Size, Share and Demand Forecast;

Copyright © 2006, ECNext, Inc. All Rights Reserved